Jump to content

Talk:Masturbation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateMasturbation is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 21, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted


Health masturbation?

[edit]

Masturbation is not health-beneficial; there is merely a correlation between more frequent ejaculation and a lower risk of prostate cancer, regardless of whether the ejaculation occurred sinfully or not. This correlation could theoretically also be caused directly by hormone levels without mediation through ejaculation.

Otherwise, the risk of prostate cancer is negligible up to around the age of 50, and therefore, natural family planning through sexual abstinence does not significantly increase the risk of cancer. After around 50 years of age, women experience menopause, and the couple can engage in sexual intercourse at will. The situation is different for priests and monks, as they have completely devoted themselves to God, and any potential increased risk of prostate cancer is part of the sacrifice." 89.190.52.148 (talk) 23:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, now where are the sources? ZZZ'S 23:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Science can make no positive statements about how priests and monks should behave sexually. Many Eastern Orthodox priests are married, with children, and the same applies to many Protestant pastors. Also, many Eastern Orthodox monks have lovers or pay prostitutes.
I agree that the correlation between masturbation and the chance of prostate cancer is murky.
The correlation between having orgasms and cardiovascular health does not mean causation: both erections and cardiovascular health suffer from deposits of cholesterol.
More generally: the claim that Masturbation is not health-beneficial is utterly rejected by mainstream medicine. There are enough mainstream WP:RS WP:CITED in our article to that effect.
The only proven ill health effect of masturbation is producing Peyronie disease in men who are foolish enough to try to bend their erect penis. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hard flaccid syndrome

[edit]

I am dubious about the recent edit that makes the article claim that masturbation a risk factor for hard flaccid syndrome. The only mention of masturbation in the cited source is the paragraph that begins "Most patients report that their symptoms started after a traumatic event (use of vacuum, tough masturbation or sex, jelqing, excessive squatting) ... At best, this might support a statement that hard flaccid syndrome is a possible result of "tough masturbation", but a blanket statement that masturbation is a risk does not seem supported. Based on the statement in the source, it would be equally supported to say that sex is a risk factor for TFS. The paper also says "A traumatic injury at the base of an erect penis is the initial event, so saying that masturbation risks TFS without mentioning the need for a concommitant traumatic injury seems misleading. CodeTalker (talk) 23:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, the same applies to Peyronie disease: it only applies to certain cases. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
hello. this condition is exceptionally uncommon with very limited published literature available. there are no more than 10 scientific/medical papers in existence on the subject currently, as it's a newly recognized condition and research is ongoing, and it has recently garnered more attention due to its increasing prevalence, particularly in young men. though uncommon, I think it’s important to keep this information on the page, as I believe people should be aware of this as a potential consequence of masturbation. to also push back on your "tough masturbation" contention a bit, "tough masturbation" is still masturbation, is it not? I would think it is, and perhaps I can revise the wording to be more explicit about it being a potential consequence of "tough masturbation," aligning it more closely with the source. while this is anecdotal and certainly irrelevant as its tangential to the topic at hand, I personally suffer from this condition, and it developed abruptly after innocently masturbating one night a few years ago. it has ruined my life, to say the least, as I am in my mid twenties and am on disability right now because of it. the public needs to know that this is something that can happen as a consequence of masturbation, and I will monitor the page closely and vow to make updates as soon as a more reliable or comprehensive source becomes available. for now, this is the best secondary source available. Jesterhfs (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of Videos

[edit]

A sizable number of young teens injure themselves each year due to incorrect understanding of masturbation, many times causing irreversible harm to their genitals. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that wikipedia remains a relavant source to spread correct awareness on this subject, keeping aside conservativism. Livingstonshr (talk) 14:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable medical source for that, and does that source justify the inclusion of videos? Grayfell (talk) 20:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As of now I could not find any source on wikimedia approved clinically, however this does solve the primary purpose according to me as stated above. Livingstonshr (talk) 06:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm asking for a reliable source. Please review Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Most of the content on Wikimedia is not reliable. Please provide a source explaining precisely what this problem is. From there, we can evaluate if and how these videos would address that problem. Grayfell (talk) 06:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]