Jump to content

Miluk language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Lower Coquille language)

T:transitive marker EST:established

Miluk
Lower Coquille
miluk tɬiis
Pronunciation[míluk]
Native toUnited States
RegionOregon
EthnicityMiluk people
Extinct1939, with the death of Annie Miner Peterson
Revival[1]
Coosan
  • Miluk
Language codes
ISO 639-3iml
iml
Glottologmilu1241
Map of Coosan languages

Miluk, also known as Lower Coquille from its location, is one of two Coosan languages. It shares more than half of its vocabulary with Hanis, though these are not always obvious, and grammatical differences cause the two languages to look quite different. Miluk started being displaced by Athabascan in the late 18th century, and many Miluk shifted to Athabascan and Hanis.

Miluk was spoken around the lower Coquille River and the South Slough of Coos Bay. The name míluk is the endonym, derived from a village name. The last fully fluent speaker of Miluk was Annie Miner Peterson, who died in 1939. She knew both Miluk and Hanis, and made a number of recordings.[2][3] Laura Hodgkiss Metcalf, who died in 1961, was the last functional speaker (her mother was Miluk), and was an informant to Morris Swadesh for his Penutian Vocabulary Survey.

Phonology

[edit]

Consonants

[edit]

The consonant inventory of Miluk can be tabulated as follows, based on Douglas-Tavani (2024)[4]:

Bilabial Alveolar Alveo-
palatal
Velar Uvular Glottal
plain sibilant lateral plain labialized plain labialized plain labialized
Plosive/
Affricate
voiceless p t t͜s t͜ɬ t͜ʃ k q ʔ
ejective t͜sʼ t͜ɬʼ t͜ʃʼ kʼʷ qʷʼ
voiced b d d͜z d͜l d͜ʒ ɡ ɡʷ ɢ ɢʷ
Fricative voiceless s ɬ ʃ x χ χʷ h
voiced ɣ (ʁ)
Sonorant plain m n l j w
glottalized
  • /ɣ/ may also range to uvular [ʁ] in free variation.
  • /m, n, l/ also have geminated equivalents [, , ]. Gemination may be phonemic in Miluk, but Jacobs (1939 & 1940) transcribed few instances of these geminate sonorants. Some words transcribed with [, , ] in the data are also transcribed at other times with [m, n, l], while some words are transcribed consistently as geminated and never as their shorter counterparts. Due to this ambiguity, the geminate sonorants are listed here as allophonic.

Vowels

[edit]

The vowels in Miluk are /i, u, ə, ɛ, ɑ/.

  • /ɛ/ may also be heard as [æ], as vowels /i, u/ are also heard as [ɪ, ʊ] in short form.

Vowel harmony occurs in Miluk, although sporadic. The most common occurrence of vowel harmony in Miluk is the harmonization of /ɛ/ in roots with /ɑ/ in suffixes.[5]

Grammar

[edit]

Syntax

[edit]

Verb - Argument Order

[edit]

Miluk verbs have a tendency to be clause-initial.[5] Arguments that are expressed with overt noun phrases usually follow the verb, while pronominal arguments expressed are encoded in clitics that attach to the verb.[5] Absolutive and ergative arguments can be interchangeable.[5]

The following example shows the ergative argument before the absolutive argument.

áyu

indeed

ás-d-a

decorate-T-3.OBJ

tłə-x

ART-ERG

hú'mik'

old.woman

tłə

ART

də-dím

3SG-POSS

sin

grandson

áyu ás-d-a tłə-x hú'mik' tłə də-dím sin

indeed decorate-T-3.OBJ ART-ERG old.woman ART 3SG-POSS grandson

"Indeed the old woman decorated her grandson."[5]

However, in the next example, the absolutive argument precedes the ergative argument.

Tsú

Cu

NR

wɛn

wen

thus

ilduwa

illtwa

say

tɬə

ʎə

ART

tə-

3SG.POS

hímɛ

hiime

children

tɬɛ

ʎə

ART

-x

-x

ERG

t’smíxwən

c’miixwən

trickster

Tsú wɛn ilduwa tɬə dí hímɛ tɬɛ -x t’smíxwən

Cu wen illtwa ʎə tə- hiime ʎə -x c’miixwən

NR thus say ART 3SG.POS children ART ERG trickster

"Then this is what the trickster told his children"

Order Variation in Presentational Constructions

[edit]

Miluk often uses a presentational construction when telling stories or recounting an event to bring attention to the subject of the story.[5] As a result of this, the affected noun phrase is fronted in the sentence and often appears clause-initially. The following examples are of the presentational construction, with the presented construction bolded.

gwɛis

kweis

girl

gus

kuus

all

mín

min

time

du

tu

HAB

kwí

kwi

EST

alam

alam

myrtle.nut

yúgwa

yugwa

gather

gwɛis gus mín du kwí alam yúgwa

kweis kuus min tu kwi alam yugwa

girl all time HAB EST myrtle.nut gather

"There was a girl who was always picking myrtle nuts"

Tit’sɛwəs

Tic’eewəs

Young.girl

tsú

cu

now

ha

ha

REC.PERF

dlúqws

ʎuqws

get.up

-əm

-əm

NTR

Tit’sɛwəs tsú ha dlúqws -əm

Tic’eewəs cu ha ʎuqws -əm

Young.girl now REC.PERF get.up NTR

"A girl who had just passed her first menses had just now arisen."

Possessive Order

[edit]

In Miluk, the possessive noun phrase precedes what is possessed. The possessed noun takes no article but instead is marked with the oblique [tə].

Morphology

[edit]

There are two articles in Miluk, kʷə and ʎə. ʎə is used with nouns that are closer to the speaker, while kʷə is used for nouns which are more distant. These articles do not reflect a gender of a noun and both articles have been found in use for the same noun in discourse.[5] Verbs have intransitive, imperfect, and perfect marker. Verbs which are intransitive take the -u suffix, while the imperfect tense takes the -ʔi suffix and the perfect tense takes the -t suffix.[5]

Morphosyntactic Alignment

[edit]

Miluk has an ergative–absolutive distinction, expressed morphologically;[5] the suffix -x denotes the ergative case in Miluk, and the absolutive case is unmarked.

In the following examples, the ergative argument comes before the absolutive argument.

áyu

indeed

ás-d-a

decorate-T-3.OBJ

tłə-x

ART-ERG

hú'mik'

old.woman

tłə

art

də-dím

3SG-POSS

sin

grandson

áyu ás-d-a tłə-x hú'mik' tłə də-dím sin

indeed decorate-T-3.OBJ ART-ERG old.woman art 3SG-POSS grandson

"Indeed the old woman decorated her grandson."[5]

Miluk allows for the opposite to occur, as we see the absolutive argument precede the ergative argument.

gasíya

almost

du

HAB

galam

grab

tłə

ART

máqt'ł

crow

tłə-x

ART-ERG

gwɛis

girl

gasíya du galam tłə máqt'ł tłə-x gwɛis

almost HAB grab ART crow ART-ERG girl

"The girl almost caught the crow."

Gender, Number, Person

[edit]

Miluk does not have a masculine/feminine gender distinction, but it does have reflexives of an old gender system. The language reflects this old system in two instances: with a suffix that follows articles (-č) and in lexical items for male and female people throughout life.[5] The suffix -č has been seen to be optional but occurs in three instances:

  1. following a feminine noun,
  2. referring to a young person, and (the most common)
  3. referring to elders.[5]

The second place where Miluk holds on to an older gender system is when referring to males or females. Words for males often begin with /t/, while the female words often begin with /hu/ and /w/.[5]

Miluk has no marked third person clitic on verbs.[4][5] This is flouted as presentational fronting occurs whenever a new argument is introduced, which are the sentences most likely to have two third-person arguments, and sentences uttered after this argument has been introduced that have two third-person arguments will only express the defocused one through an overt noun phrase, while the other is understood through context within the discourse rather than through a co-indexed clitic.[4][5]

Miluk has an inclusive and exclusive distinction when it comes to the dual possessive. In the first person dual inclusive, the words receive the circumfix s=nə-, while the first person dual exclusive receives the prefix nə-.[5]

Pronominal prefixes[5]
Singular Dual Plural
1 w(ə)- s- (inc) ɬ-
nə- (excl)
2 nə- is- čil-
3 Ø ič- iɬ-

Space, Time, Modality

[edit]

There are two morphemes which can be added to a verb to mark tense. The morpheme han indicates the prospective tense, which describes that an event is going to occur.[5] The other morpheme that can be added to a verb is hanƛ, which marks the future tense. The future tense is distinguished from the prospective tense and has appeared irrealis marker a ̆x. The order in which the morphemes appear are the pronominal clitics, followed by mood, tense and then aspect.[5]

In the following examples, "han" indicates that an event is going to occur.[5]

Tsú

Cu

NR

han

han

PRSP

t’ámi

t’aami

carry

tɬə

ʎə

ART

də-

tə-

3SG.POS

t’ím

t’im

Pack

Tsú han t’ámi tɬə də- t’ím

Cu han t’aami ʎə tə- t’im

NR PRSP carry ART 3SG.POS Pack

"Now she was going to pack her load"[5]

Tsú

Cu

NR

han

han

PRSP

áyu

aayu

indeed

ġɛlts

qelc

cross

Tsú han áyu ġɛlts

Cu han aayu qelc

NR PRSP indeed cross

"And then she was going to cross on it indeed"[5]

Obliques

[edit]

The morpheme tə marks an oblique or possessive, which occurs throughout the Salish language family. The following two example reveals -tə acting as the oblique marker.

Tsú

cu

now

k’wɛn

k’ween

news

wus-

wus-

REDUP

ú’s

wus

go.home

-u

-u

NTR.PERF

tɬə

ʎə

ART

də-

te-

3SG.POS

‘úmnatt’ɬ

umnaaʎ

grandmother

-ədja

-əča

LOC

Tsú k’wɛn wus- ú’s -u tɬə də- ‘úmnatt’ɬ -ədja

cu k’ween wus- wus -u ʎə te- umnaaʎ -əča

now news REDUP go.home NTR.PERF ART 3SG.POS grandmother LOC

"He returned with news to his grandmother"

tsú

cu

now

ma

CONT

gɛ’

qee

there

yáhwi

yahwi

rub

tɬə

ʎə

ART

te

3SG.POS

yɛis

yeis

mouth

-ədja

-əča

LOC

tsú má gɛ’ yáhwi tɬə də yɛis -ədja

cu ma qee yahwi ʎə te yeis -əča

now CONT there rub ART 3SG.POS mouth LOC

"And he kept rubbing it on her mouth"

Status

[edit]

The Miluk dialect of the Coosan language is now extinct. The last speakers were two sisters, Lolly Hotchkiss and Daisy Wasson Codding. The two worked with a linguist in 1953 to record words from the language but the two were not fluent in adulthood, and had trouble remembering words.[2] The last native speaker was Annie Miner Peterson, who knew both Miluk and Hanis.[2] Annie Peterson's first language was Miluk, and in 1930, Annie Miner Peterson began working with Melville Jacobs and the two produced two volumes of texts in both dialects of Coos.[2] Coos Narrative and Ethnographic Texts and Coos Myth Texts were the two publications were published, but the two publications did not have any linguistic analysis. The books only provided English translations to the texts.[5]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Contact". dlank'ts tɬə tɬiis. Retrieved 2025-01-17.
  2. ^ a b c d Whereat, Patty (June 2001). "The Milluk Language - Ghaala" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 7, 2014. Retrieved March 26, 2018.
  3. ^ Macnaughtan, Don (1995). "Remembering the Rhinoceros: The Coquille Indian Tribe Establish a New Tribal Library on the Central Oregon Coast". Vol. OLA Quarterly 1, no. 2. Retrieved 2018-05-31.
  4. ^ a b c Douglas-Tavani, Jordan A.G. (2024). A Reference Grammar of miluk tɬiis tɬə miluk tɬiis buuqw (PhD thesis). University of California, Santa Barbara.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Doty, Christopher S (June 2012). "A Reassessment of the Genetic Classification of Miluk Coos" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 2, 2014. Retrieved March 26, 2018.
  • Wurm, Mühlhäusler, & Tryon, 1996. Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas, p. 1148.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Jacobs, Melville. (1939). Coos narrative and ethnologic texts. University of Washington publications in anthropology (Vol. 8, No. 1). Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
  • Jacobs, Melville. (1940). Coos myth texts. University of Washington publications in anthropology (Vol. 8, No. 2). Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
  • Anderson, Troy. (1990). Miluk Dictionary. Stanford Library. Green Library Stacks. PM961 .A53 1990
[edit]