User talk:Skyfiler

Hi,

I changed "August First Rockets" back to Bayi Rockets, because English-language media in China and elsewhere very rarely use the name "August First Rockets" (or "August 1st Rockets" or "August 1 Rockets").

Doing a Google search on August First/August 1st/August 1 Rockets shows only a handful of hits, maybe a dozen. Doing a search on "Bayi Rockets" shows 2000+ hits (and "Bayi Shuanglu" and "Bayi Army Rockets" adds a few dozen more). Sites such as http://english.people.com.cn/ (English-language People's Daily) also use "Bayi Rockets".

I did edit the Bayi Rockets page to mention the "August 1st" connection clearer, though.

-- Curps 19:16, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Tao(disambiguation)

I would have just moved the page myself, but there was a notice that a major edit was being undergone, so I decided not to. After you are done, please move the page to Tao (disambiguation), with a space between "Tao" and "(disambiguation)". Thanks, zappa 03:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Xiahou Dun

i don't see the point of adding links to Zhang Fei and Liu Chan under "See also" in the abovementioned article. Please elaborate. Also, i believe that linking to History of China is rather far-fetched. What do you think? --Plastictv 08:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Edits to book references

Hi. Please do not change the author names and book titles of the books placed under Reference sections. It might pose problems or confusions to readers who try to locate the books. Just leave them as they are stated. Thanks a lot. --Plastictv 01:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Skyfiler, I think you are marking your edits as minor by default (see 'my preferences' -> 'Editing'). Remember to mark your edits as minor only when they genuinely are (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'." --pfctdayelise 13:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mao: Genocide and democide

I only restored the Mao regime to the list because it is a recognized democide. I have no personal feelings about the number, although I am aware it is in the tens of millions. It used to be 40 million; another user changed it to 70 million. I won't object if you return it to that 40 million, althouth another user might. The big problem is that you removed it outright rather than editing it. The definition of democide does include "reckless and depraved disregard for life," which includes mass starvation. Mao's regime is even included in that article, with a value of 40 million.

I'm going to restore Mao again. If you have justification for editing that value, please do so but to remove it outright corrupts the article. It makes it inconsistent with other articles about Mao and democide.

Finally, removing 70 million deaths from this list is a significant edit. Please start a conversation on the Talk page before you make any edits that significant.

- Sethery 15:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your BLOG1 link

In your user page, you might want to check your first blog link http://jiangsheng.blogsopt.com/ as the site seems to be dead (it goes to all advertising now). Shenme 12:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

one-child policy

I attempted to flesh out the human rights section with some sources. I inadvertantly made a mess. You seem to be active and experienced, could you please take a look at my edits. In particular I think its important to show that China official policy seems to disagree with alledged practices as reported by alledged officials charged in the execution of these duties. You may want to touch on the autonomy of local officials and their own initiatives to appease bejing (at least in my view). I'm sure there is a source for such, could easily be compared to some of the nutty things local US governments do that fly in the face of official US human rights policy. Also I tried to touch on the historical practice of at least forced sterilization and how even the US is guilty of endorsing it in the past, especially the fact that some laws are still on the books here making it legal to sterilize the 'feebleminded'. Its my personal opinion that because of the nature of Chinese government its hard to say that if these things are occurring, its sponsored at the national level, and in fact more likely its personal initiatives by local officials. I think its important to not only point out human rights violations, but also who is claiming such violations and their own history on violations of same type. People are trying to condemn China for trying to deal with a very real population problem using methods the rest of the world freely and openly practiced at various times in the last 100 years, and practiced for the sake of nothing more than eugenics - dealing with social problems through genetics, a flawed approach utilizing means that clearly violate any accepted human rights standard. You might find it interesting reading material, even the US Supreme Court sided with the states in their assertion of the right to sterilize people for being nothing more than feebleminded - at a time when the diagnostic ability to accurately determine what febblemindedness was, let alone that it was genetic and could be dealt with by reproduction was non-exsistant. How many US citizens were sterilized that were suffering from lack of education and oppertunity? suffering from treatable mental illness with no genetic cause? suffering from developmental problems caused by things like lead paint? - in other words at no increased risk for having developmentally impaired offspring... Even as recently as 1980 these people were denied civil judgement by the Supreme Court. random wiki reader 65.24.200.137 21:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I answered you...

here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cao_Cao#Family_templates --Sarazyn • TALK • DE 09:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please tell me what you think of it? -- Sarazyn • TALK • DE 10:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

I notcied that you've left messages for Zappa.jake on his talk page, so I thought you mihgt want to vote in his RfA at WP:RFA. ShortJason 15:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for ShortJason's advertising. Normally most people consider it unacceptable to advertise RfAs (Requests for Adminship) on people's talk pages. I have asked him to stop here. Regardless, now that it's here, if you do wish to vote, do so here. Sorry, zappa.jak e (talk) 19:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BanqiaoDamAfterFailure.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BanqiaoDamAfterFailure.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Wuhan

Hey, I just extensively expanded the Battle of Wuhan article.. Please check it out! :)

--AQu01rius 17:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Calling programmers

We need coders for the WikiProject Disambigation fixer. We need to make a program to make faster and easier the fixing of links. We will be happy if you could check the project. You can Help! --Neo139 09:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...

I think you may have copied the wrong link here. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 16:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Burning of books and burying of scholars

If you have time, could you possibly translate the note section and put the translation in parantheses after it? We've got quite a backlog on the translation project, so your help would be greatly appreciated! -Yupik 07:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

You also violate WP:3RR rule from editing of Shang dynasty

Current events

Thanks for finding better sources for the Chinese terror-raid story. The Fox News link turns out to have been temporary. KazakhPol 20:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renminbi usage in foreign countries

Hi,

I have heard of the 60% figure in Mongolia. However, the link you provided seem to be broken. Do you think you can find another source. Thanks. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 14:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zhou Tong (archer)

I see that you created a page for Qin Kuai. I think some of the info came from my rewrite of the Yue Fei page. I know the page is not as good as it could be, but it's a lot better than what it was. Anyway, I'm trying to promote my article about Yue Fei's teacher from A-class to Feature article and I am looking for people to vote on it. I figure you might like the page since you created one on Qin. After reading the page, please leave comments on the article's FAC page. (Ghostexorcist 06:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

IP blocking?

((unblock-auto|1=64.217.74.225|2=repeated vandalism for several days|3=Can't sleep, clown will eat me)) --Skyfiler 15:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've contacted the blocking admin, please hold. --Yamla 16:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is some nasty vandalism. Skyfiler, please contact the unblock-en mailing list from your ISP-issued email address regarding this request. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Sichuan earthquake

Hi, some anonymous IPs are adding Republic of China as a country in this article. Noticed you reverted one of such edit. Thanks for the revert. I have reverted such disruptive edits two times and bordering 3rr. Please have an eye on this issue. Also see this edit. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan is back. User:Nyttend added it back. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 02:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Oak Pacific Interactive

A tag has been placed on Oak Pacific Interactive, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Human flesh search engine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Human flesh search engine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Blowdart | ^talk 20:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to the People's Republic of China

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a large amount of information from People's Republic of China. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ono (talk) 00:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kung Fu Hustle

Kung Fu Hustle has recently gone through several improvements and is again nominated for a WP:FA. Any useful comments can be given. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 13:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Skyfiler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Klaus Schlappner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peng Peiyun - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wu Shaozu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of words censored by search engines in the People's Republic of China

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of words censored by search engines in the People's Republic of China. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words censored by search engines in the People's Republic of China. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of BMP format

I reverted your revision because you attempted to delve into the detail of the BMP files in the intro of the article. This section is supposed to contain only general introductory statements and not the details. Also your mentioning of the size of some of the headers and file structure duplicates information in the section "File Structure" in the article.

A more appropriate place for mentioning the usage frequency of certain BMP formats is the "Usage of BMP format" section of the article as it is not a technical format information but rather sociological statement referring to the current programming and marketing trends. Also, if you are going to make concrete statements about the usage frequency of certain bitmap formats, be prepared to support it with references to statistical research.

Note that the article already contains a statement that some mechanisms in the BMP files are used more frequently than the others. e.g. the sentence: "The BITFIELD mechanism described above allows for the definition of tens of thousands different pixel formats, however only several of them are used in practice" - and proceeds to list these formats.

In any case, the introductory section of the article is not a place for such information.

Verpies (talk)verpies —Preceding undated comment added 09:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Taiwan

Regarding this edit, could you please cite the specific section of WP:Naming conventions (geographic names) that supports your view? --Cybercobra (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the place does not exist anymore, or the article deals only with a place in a period when it held a different name, the widely accepted historical English name should be used. The article deals with ROC which held a different name in an extended period (in fact it is still holding on that name).--Skyfiler (talk) 02:00, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article also (and post-move, arguably mainly) deals with modern Taiwan, hence your excerpt fails on the "only" qualifier. --Cybercobra (talk) 02:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I direct your attention to these two edit summaries. --Cybercobra (talk) 02:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the WP:COMMONNAME can override WP:DUE in the context of article text, it self is just a section of WP:TITLE. Look up Taiwan in a dictionary as instructed by Wikipedia:Naming conventions (precision) or encyclopedia like Merriam-Webster's, The American Heritage Dictionary or Britannica. Just because you say A is the common name of B in the context of B does not mean you can define A is B when A has a much broader definition. You need to prove that A is B in most contexts of A. And certainly you can't prove Taiwan is ROC when dominant definition among authoritative dictionaries define Taiwan as something else than a country.--Skyfiler (talk) 03:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nine Chapter Law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jin Dynasty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Skyfiler. You have new messages at Talk:Caribbean Medical University.
Message added 21:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SGMD1 ^Talk/_Contribs 21:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 Chongqing vs Shenyang football match, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Qingdao Hainiu and Jilin Aodong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Skyfiler. You have new messages at HMSSolent's talk page.
Message added 01:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

P.S.: it would have been better to place quoted material in quotation marks, and perhaps a bit of revamp to the lead section. I've removed the tags for now. hmssolent\^{Let's convene} _{My patrols} 01:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Offshore Medical School in the Caribbean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trimester (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Skyfiler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JavaScript RegExp problem

I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

about this [1] - you see that Rajmaan's comment is from LAST July, right? 2016. I think his/her points were largely unactionable and that is why they were simply left unattended to. but congratulations for being a Chinese person outside the groupthink.... Happy monsoon day 22:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cao and Xiahou family

Template:Cao and Xiahou family has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. LDS _{contact me} 06:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Skyfiler. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Skyfiler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Skyfiler. Thank you for creating September 11 Great Armed Clan Feud of Matian. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]